Original Article

Technological Strategies for Blended Learning Courses of Distance Education in India

Year: 2024 | Month: June | Volume 15 | Issue 1

References (35)

1.All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE). 2023. All India Survey on Higher Education 2021–22. Ministry of Education, Government of India.

View at Google Scholar

2.Anderson, T. 2008. Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). AU Press.

View at Google Scholar

3.Bates, A.W. 2019. Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates. https://

View at Google Scholar

4.Bhushan, S. 2020. Open and distance learning in India: Policy, practice and prospects. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 1–17.

View at Google Scholar

5.Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.

View at Google Scholar

6.Chickering, A.W. and Ehrmann, S.C. 1996. Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49(2), 3–6.

View at Google Scholar

7.Crompton, H. and Burke, D. 2018. The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123: 53–64.

View at Google Scholar

8.Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

View at Google Scholar

9.Derouin, R.E., Fritzsche, B.A. and Salas, E. 2005. E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6): 920–940.

View at Google Scholar

10.Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.

View at Google Scholar

11.Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A. and Sicilia, N. 2018. Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1): Article 3.

View at Google Scholar

12.Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. and Buchner, A. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2): 175–191.

View at Google Scholar

13.Garg, A. and Garg, R. 2019. SWAYAM MOOCs: Enrolment pattern, completion rates and challenges. Distance Education in China, 9(2): 17–28.

View at Google Scholar

14.Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. 2000. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3): 87–105.

View at Google Scholar

15.Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2): 95–105.

View at Google Scholar

16.Garrison, D.R. and Vaughan, N.D. 2008. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

View at Google Scholar

17.Graham, C.R. 2006. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing.

View at Google Scholar

18.Halverson, L.R. and Graham, C.R. 2019. Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2): 145–178.

View at Google Scholar

19.Hayes, A.F. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

View at Google Scholar

20.Islam, A.K.M.N. 2011. Understanding e-learning adoption in a developing country. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 5(2–3): 124–142.

View at Google Scholar

21.Iyer, R. 2021. Language barriers in digital higher education in India: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3): 112–124.

View at Google Scholar

22.Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I. and Vavoula, G. 2015. The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Combining e-learning and m-learning (pp. 151–177). IGI Global. https://

View at Google Scholar

23.Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. and Bakia, M. 2013. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A metaanalysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3): 1–47.

View at Google Scholar

24.Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

View at Google Scholar

25.Mishra, S. and Panda, S. 2007. Development and factor analysis of an instrument to measure student attitude towards e-learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1): 27–33.

View at Google Scholar

26.Moore, M.G. 1989. Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2): 1–6.

View at Google Scholar

27.Oliver, M. and Trigwell, K. 2005. Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1): 17–26.

View at Google Scholar

28.Panda, S. and Mishra, S. 2007. E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4): 323–338.

View at Google Scholar

29.Phutela, N. and Dwivedi, S. 2020. A qualitative study of students’ perspective on e-learning adoption in India. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4): 545–559.

View at Google Scholar

30.Sahu, P. 2020. Closure of universities due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4): e7541.

View at Google Scholar

31.Singh, V. and Thurman, A. 2019. How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4): 289–306.

View at Google Scholar

32.Traxler, J. 2009. Current state of mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9–24). AU Press.

View at Google Scholar

33.https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425091.01

View at Google Scholar

34.Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2): 273–315.

View at Google Scholar

35.Weller, M. 2011. The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic.

View at Google Scholar

@International Journal of Fermented Foods | Association with SASNET | Printed by New Delhi Publishers

64226366 - Visitors since April 13, 2019