Original Article
Technological Strategies for Blended Learning Courses of Distance Education in India
Year: 2024 | Month: June | Volume 15 | Issue 1
1.All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE). 2023. All India Survey on Higher Education 2021–22. Ministry of Education, Government of India.
View at Google Scholar2.Anderson, T. 2008. Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). AU Press.
View at Google Scholar3.Bates, A.W. 2019. Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates. https://
View at Google Scholar4.Bhushan, S. 2020. Open and distance learning in India: Policy, practice and prospects. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 1–17.
View at Google Scholar5.Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.
View at Google Scholar6.Chickering, A.W. and Ehrmann, S.C. 1996. Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49(2), 3–6.
View at Google Scholar7.Crompton, H. and Burke, D. 2018. The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123: 53–64.
View at Google Scholar8.Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
View at Google Scholar9.Derouin, R.E., Fritzsche, B.A. and Salas, E. 2005. E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6): 920–940.
View at Google Scholar10.Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.
View at Google Scholar11.Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A. and Sicilia, N. 2018. Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1): Article 3.
View at Google Scholar12.Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. and Buchner, A. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2): 175–191.
View at Google Scholar13.Garg, A. and Garg, R. 2019. SWAYAM MOOCs: Enrolment pattern, completion rates and challenges. Distance Education in China, 9(2): 17–28.
View at Google Scholar14.Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. 2000. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3): 87–105.
View at Google Scholar15.Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2): 95–105.
View at Google Scholar16.Garrison, D.R. and Vaughan, N.D. 2008. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
View at Google Scholar17.Graham, C.R. 2006. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
View at Google Scholar18.Halverson, L.R. and Graham, C.R. 2019. Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2): 145–178.
View at Google Scholar19.Hayes, A.F. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
View at Google Scholar20.Islam, A.K.M.N. 2011. Understanding e-learning adoption in a developing country. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 5(2–3): 124–142.
View at Google Scholar21.Iyer, R. 2021. Language barriers in digital higher education in India: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3): 112–124.
View at Google Scholar22.Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I. and Vavoula, G. 2015. The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Combining e-learning and m-learning (pp. 151–177). IGI Global. https://
View at Google Scholar23.Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. and Bakia, M. 2013. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A metaanalysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3): 1–47.
View at Google Scholar24.Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
View at Google Scholar25.Mishra, S. and Panda, S. 2007. Development and factor analysis of an instrument to measure student attitude towards e-learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1): 27–33.
View at Google Scholar26.Moore, M.G. 1989. Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2): 1–6.
View at Google Scholar27.Oliver, M. and Trigwell, K. 2005. Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1): 17–26.
View at Google Scholar28.Panda, S. and Mishra, S. 2007. E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4): 323–338.
View at Google Scholar29.Phutela, N. and Dwivedi, S. 2020. A qualitative study of students’ perspective on e-learning adoption in India. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4): 545–559.
View at Google Scholar30.Sahu, P. 2020. Closure of universities due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4): e7541.
View at Google Scholar31.Singh, V. and Thurman, A. 2019. How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4): 289–306.
View at Google Scholar32.Traxler, J. 2009. Current state of mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9–24). AU Press.
View at Google Scholar34.Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2): 273–315.
View at Google Scholar35.Weller, M. 2011. The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
View at Google Scholar



