Original Article
Bridging Borders: Media Pedagogy, Universal Design for Learning and Open Educational Resources in Open and Distance Education
Year: 2024 | Month: June | Volume 15 | Issue 1
1.Bates, A.W. 2019. Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.
View at Google Scholar3.Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2002. Budapest open access initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative. org
View at Google Scholar4.Butcher, N. 2015. A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning & UNESCO.
View at Google Scholar5.Cape Town Open Education Declaration. 2007. Cape Town open education declaration: Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. https://www.capetowndeclaration.org
View at Google Scholar6.Carey, T. and Trick, D. 2013. How online learning affects productivity, cost and quality in higher education. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 368.
View at Google Scholar7.CAST. 2018. Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
View at Google Scholar8.Commonwealth of Learning. 2016. Open educational resources: Global report 2017. Commonwealth of Learning.
View at Google Scholar9.Ferdig, R.E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R. and Mouza, C. 2020. Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. AACE.
View at Google Scholar10.Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson, T.J. and Wiley, D.A. 2015. A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3): 159–172.
View at Google Scholar12.Garrison, D.R. 2000. Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1): 1–17.
View at Google Scholar13.Hilton, J. 2016. Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4): 573–590.
View at Google Scholar14.Hilton, J. 2016. Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4): 573–590.
View at Google Scholar15.Jhangiani, R.S. and Biswas-Diener, R. (Eds.). 2017. Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. Ubiquity Press.
View at Google Scholar16.Kellner, D. and Share, J. 2019. The critical media literacy guide: Engaging media and transforming education. Brill Sense.
View at Google Scholar17.Kumar, K.L. and Wideman, M. 2014. Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1): 125–147.
View at Google Scholar18.Mace, R.L. 1985. Universal design: Barrier free environments for everyone. Designers West, 33(1): 147–152.
View at Google Scholar19.Mayer, R.E. 2009. Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
View at Google Scholar20.Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. and Baki, M. 2013. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A metaanalysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3): 1–47.
View at Google Scholar21.Moore, M.G. and Kearsley, G. 2012. Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
View at Google Scholar22.Olney, I., Harper, M., Hewlings, A. and Martin, L. 2012. Analysing the relationship between openness, engagement and learning: A case study of the OpenLearn platform. Open University UK.
View at Google Scholar23.Panda, S. and Mishra, S. 2007. E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4): 323–338.
View at Google Scholar24.Peters, O. 2010. Distance education in transition: Developments and issues (5th ed.). BIS-Verlag.
View at Google Scholar25.Qvortrup, L. 2007. Media Pedagogy: Media Education, Media Socialisation and Educational Media. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 3(2): 1-2.
View at Google Scholar26.Rao, K., Ok, M.W. and Bryant, B.R. 2014. A review of research on universal design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3): 153–166.
View at Google Scholar27.Rhoads, R.A., Berdan, J. and Toven-Lindsey, B. 2015. The open courseware movement in higher education: Unmasking power and raising questions about the movement’s democratic potential. Educational Theory, 63(1): 87–110.
View at Google Scholar29.Shea, P. and Bidjerano, T. 2014. Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75: 103–111.
View at Google Scholar30.Smith, F. and Harvey, A. 2014. Universal design for learning and its application in online higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3): 48–60.
View at Google Scholar31.Taylor, J.D. 2014. Terence: The development of open education in distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5).
View at Google Scholar34.Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
View at Google Scholar35.West, P. and Victor, L. 2011. Background and action paper on OER. WikiEducator.
View at Google Scholar36.Wiley, D. 2014. The access compromise and the 5th R. opencontent.org. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
View at Google Scholar37.Wiley, D. and Hilton, J.L. 2018. Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4): 133–147.
View at Google Scholar38.World Bank. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic: Shocks to education and policy responses. World Bank Group.
View at Google Scholar



